bush's fav supreme court justice loves bush
Lots of it. All at once. Orgy-style.
So says this article (I am trying to get onto Harvard's newspaper The Crimson to verify, but it seems like everyone else is too and it's not connecting). "I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged" is what Justice Antonin Scalia told a Harvard crowd when asked about his views on sexual morality.
That's right, gay marriage is bad, but ten people piled up naked, sucking and fucking at random is a good thing and "ought to be encouraged". Last November, Justice Scalia dissented with the majority on a decision that overturned a Texas law that banned homosexual sex, even authoring the dissent, yet he himself, it seems, like to get it on with multiple other partners in the room.
I'm sorry, but to me that seems a little "inconsistent" (being the favortie word of the right this election). It also seems inconsistent on Bush's part in that he has said that Anotin "orgies ought to be encouraged" Scalia and Clarence "There's a pubic hair on my Coke" Thomas are the models by which he'd choose replacement judges if he were given the opportunity to appoint. Oh my head.
Why does the religious right support this shit? Seriously. Orgies? They stand behind a man that publically states that orgies are beneficial and "ought to be encouraged"? WTF?
...then again, maybe I'm just being uptight.
So says this article (I am trying to get onto Harvard's newspaper The Crimson to verify, but it seems like everyone else is too and it's not connecting). "I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged" is what Justice Antonin Scalia told a Harvard crowd when asked about his views on sexual morality.
That's right, gay marriage is bad, but ten people piled up naked, sucking and fucking at random is a good thing and "ought to be encouraged". Last November, Justice Scalia dissented with the majority on a decision that overturned a Texas law that banned homosexual sex, even authoring the dissent, yet he himself, it seems, like to get it on with multiple other partners in the room.
I'm sorry, but to me that seems a little "inconsistent" (being the favortie word of the right this election). It also seems inconsistent on Bush's part in that he has said that Anotin "orgies ought to be encouraged" Scalia and Clarence "There's a pubic hair on my Coke" Thomas are the models by which he'd choose replacement judges if he were given the opportunity to appoint. Oh my head.
Why does the religious right support this shit? Seriously. Orgies? They stand behind a man that publically states that orgies are beneficial and "ought to be encouraged"? WTF?
...then again, maybe I'm just being uptight.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home